Monday, January 18, 2010

Headstone Companies Who Will Join Me In Voting ONLY For Those Who Will Privatize Social InSecurity?

Who will join me in voting ONLY for those who will privatize Social inSecurity? - headstone companies

One topic that is to never hear how each person without any children, which completely demolished before retirement age by social security. 30 or 40 years of deposits and when you die you what? $ 200? Not even to mention paying for a tombstone to say of a funeral. It is a surprise to me that politicians do not tempt people to do things that they die young, so that all the money stays w / Soc Sec pay all that money gets all his life and family have nothing to help w / funeral expenses. Yuck! Private accounts could change all that, even if they only do that if we want to continue to the government of negligence and fraud, and then select only those to privatize.

It is a Ponzi scheme is immoral for a private company to go to jail if such a program execution.

Galveston is a perfect example of how a privatized system is far superior to social insecurity (also known as a Ponzi) scheme.

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m6 ...

6 comments:

countryb... said...

Yes, I know of 6 different people in my family who do not collect Social Security for long, and another who died just 50 as he.
There were few opportunities for years to put Social Security money was withdrawn from the fund. Our government is now supported, what they think is right to use the fund. Go to your nearest Social Security and see how many U.S. citizens born in the search for benefits for people in the United States, the performances are compared. Those who have passed, Washington, saved her money, if you are having problems, what you have to say.

anteater said...

S / S is the last "to-your-own-good" or "nanny" of the law. Designed for those who refuse store to plan their own future. In any case, should be privatized (with a phased manner, fair, those already in the system). But you must first decide what the private program that ignores or not.

Dr. Wu said...

I am pleased to privatize SS. Where 10% of your account and pay for my mother and my father saw it costs each year. Who will support all those who are already in the SS, let them on the street? It nusring TWE or empty homes and hospitals?

Did you get a family member for benefits? Most of the people to do over 40. So now we have to work to support them, rather than invest their own retirement.

Jerry H said...

Any person who is in his 30-he would enter a millionaire with 15% retired persons deprived of their control. 15%? Yes, your employer does not pay as much as the system for you.
When you retire, you get almost nothing! In addition, the retirement age must be 70 or 72 by then.
They are robbed, what will you do?

notyou31... said...

NO WAY. Workers spilled blood, sweat and tears to get a soc. sec. System to protect the elderly, and we will not let people like you to take. Reject if you do not like it, but most need in this country. Keep Your Hands Off My soc. sec.

honeybee... said...

The Liberals do not let it happen to want something to change existing programs and to retain power over the people

Post a Comment